Kinera Celest PhoenixCall Multi-Driver Tribrid IEMs

General Information

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall is a brand new pair of multi-driver hybrid IEMs designed with a five-driver hybrid setup featuring one DD+2BA+2FPD(Flat Planar Drivers) per side. Phoenixcall has got exquisite ear shells with hand-painted face covers.

Will update the post after some more information is available.

Here are some photos i clicked:-
1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

Latest reviews

briantbrain

New Head-Fier
Beauty Requires Investment
Pros: + Very satisfying unboxing experience
+ Beautiful IEM and cable
+ Suitable for Old-School songs, Blues, etc.
+ Vocals segmented for low mid frequency lovers
+ Long sub-bass rumble
+ Punchy bass
+ Wide and grand soundstage
+ With the right cable, this IEM can have one of the best vocal sounds in its price range
Cons: - Micro details are not the strong point of this IEM
- Metallic upper treble
- Separation is not the best in the upper mid to treble range
- Needs a cable change to unlock its true vocal potential
- Sub-bass feels unclear in some songs

Beauty Requires Investment​

At first, I was reluctant to review it since it hasn’t gained much traction in Indonesia. But after seeing the IEM, it looked stunning, and the driver configuration intrigued me with the inclusion of a micro planar driver. Does that mean it's a smaller planar driver? I’m not sure of the difference.
Let's dive in… Celest Phoenixcall.

IMG-20240507-WA0015.jpg

==DISCLAIMER==​

All my impressions and reviews are subjective, adhering to the belief, "only my savings can be lied to, but reviews must be honest." Agree? Fine. Disagree? Fine. I review because I want to and enjoy it, not because I need to.
  • But you might say I’m biased because I’m using it? Absolutely not. I’m a true audiophile hobbyist who will always be honest without bias. Don’t believe me? Read till the end, we’ll explore the pros and cons.
  • You might think this is just the honeymoon phase? In this hobby, which is truly "dark and full of poison," it will remain so until the end of the world. Human desire never ends.
  • But should you listen to me? Absolutely.
Important! I recommend auditioning it yourself; maybe it’s my ears that need an ENT doctor, or perhaps yours do.

==THIS POST IS FOR==​

  • What's my recommended IEM around $160?
  • Which IEM has unique and pleasant vocals?
  • Which IEM has good bass?
  • Just want to read the review

==MY DAILY DRIVER==​

  • Symphonium Crimson
  • Kinera Verdandi
  • Sennheiser IE900
  • Kontinum Soara
  • Fiio Q15
  • HibyDigital M300

==TESTED WITH==​

  • · YouTube Music
  • · Tidal
  • · Hiby M300
  • · Fiio Q15
  • · Celest Phoenixcall
  • · Sena Acoustic Rinjani

==STRAIGHT TO THE POINT==​

Unboxing:
Honestly, I was very surprised during the unboxing. Besides the cool box with its asymmetric lid, you are immediately greeted with information about the origin of the name Phoenixcall, and you can see the IEMs with their stunning faceplates. The unboxing experience is very satisfying. Included are:
  • The IEMs
  • 8 braided cable with 3.5mm jack
  • 2 types of Celest eartips with 3 sizes each (the standard Celest eartips are quite usable and decent in quality)
  • Carrying case with a sticky zipper
  • Phoenix keychain
  • Manual

IMG-20240507-WA0014.jpg

Fitting:
These IEMs are very beautiful!! With transparent resin shells, you can see the driver configuration inside. The shiny, star-studded faceplate adds to the beauty, paired with the white cable. With a fairly large body and long nozzle, these IEMs might be tricky to fit in some ears, especially needing the right eartips. But in my large ear canals, they fit perfectly fine.

Bass:
This IEM has punchy bass from the single DD that’s quite deep but with fast speed. What I love is the punchy bass that feels like it hits the back of my head and is great for headbanging. The kick drum feels more impactful.
For sub-bass, Phoenixcall has a long rumble that adds a sense of width, dynamics, and grandeur to the music. Unfortunately, in some songs, I find the sub-bass sound a bit unclear and slightly distracting.

Mid:
This is where the IEM becomes somewhat segmented for certain people. The vocals feel heavier, meaning male vocals sound good, but female high notes seem a bit restrained, though they add soul to certain songs like old-school or slow acoustic tracks.
The timbre of the mid-range lacks crispness, and the snare drum sounds a bit shy, making it feel like listening to a grown-up Justin Bieber who hasn't yet hit puberty.

Treble:
The treble is tuned tame with just enough power. The limited capacity sometimes feels unadventurous. Moreover, the upper treble sounds metallic and unnatural, which can be quite bothersome in songs requiring intense sparkling and crispness. Additionally, the upper treble feels cut off during sparkling segments.

Clarity:
The metallic upper treble is unpleasant. The micro details are not well rendered and feel shy.

Soundstage:
This is one of the plus points for this IEM. It's spacious and wide, with the added sub-bass rumble enhancing the grandeur.

Imaging:
The punchy bass overshadows the treble position, resulting in less than optimal separation. In some songs, the instruments in the upper mid to treble frequency range feel a bit clustered, with the BA and planar driver configuration lacking cohesion, resulting in subpar imaging.

IMG-20240507-WA0017.jpg

==COMPARISON==​

I was advised to try changing the cable to one with a balanced port. I happened to have a Sena Rinjani cable with a 4.4mm jack and rhodium pins, tested with a Fiio Q15 DAC/AMP. This cable made a noticeable difference, so here we go:
Note: for those in the "cable changes don't matter" sect, that’s fine, I’m just sharing my experience.
Bass:
With engaging power remaining, the depth of the bass is reduced compared to the stock cable, but it feels more textured. The unclear sub-bass remains unchanged.
Mid:
This is the best part after changing the cable. The sound feels very natural, effortless, and sweet. Not overly wet or thick, but one of the best vocal IEMs I’ve heard. The only downside is its central presentation might feel lacking for vocal enthusiasts.
Treble:
More pronounced power, no longer shy. Still with a tame tone but slightly more sparkling, though the extended treble remains cut off. Unfortunately, the metallic upper treble is still present in some songs.
Clarity, Soundstage, Imaging:
The same as before changing the cable.

IMG-20240507-WA0012.jpg

==CONCLUSION==​

  • One of the IEMs with the best unboxing experience and looks I’ve ever tried.
  • Bass and sub-bass are the main aspects of this IEM, combined with a grand soundstage. Unfortunately, the mid-range is quite segmented for some ears, and the treble is less engaging, making the timbre feel less natural, which can be a consideration before purchasing this IEM.
  • Changing to a balanced cable can be a solution I’ve proven to enhance the mid and treble aspects of this IEM.
  • Celest's unique tuning might either be perfect or unsuitable for some ears.
That’s all.
Trust your own ears.
Bye.

Attachments

  • IMG-20240507-WA0018.jpg
    IMG-20240507-WA0018.jpg
    256 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG-20240507-WA0019.jpg
    IMG-20240507-WA0019.jpg
    218.5 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: Colin5619

nikbr

500+ Head-Fier
Pretty shells & a pretty good sound? Pretty, preeetty, ... pretty good!
Pros: Nicely presented package
Decent stock cable
Offered in two colour schemes – fully transparent and a blue&pink combination
Transparent shells are always a plus – here especially since you can see the well thought out arrangement of all elements
Medium sized shell
A well-judged overall balance
Treble is tastefully done
Special tribrid driver configuration
Cons: Not the be all end all of technical prowess
Somewhat long and thick nozzle can be an issue for some
Bass lacks the satisfying low rumble
Midrange tuning can be a bit temperamental as in where it works and where it falls short
Only two variants of poorer quality silicone eartips
20240425_155458~2.jpg


Having had the possibility to try so many different sets in a relatively short time I felt obliged to go ahead and express my gratitude by trying to help some lost souls out there, just as I was when I first stumbled upon this weird hobby about wired earphones – so yesteryear! … I thought. Possibilities are seemingly endless and only by getting to meet the right people did I manage to jump onboard the train heading the 'right' direction without getting off-track thousands of times along the way. Make sure to understand the helping person's preferences and you too can find your footing and hit the ground running in no time.

A Quick Intermezzo About Me

I won't bore you for too long with personal trivia, however my quick & short background resume goes as follows. Currently I am 27 years old and more in awe of sheer power of music by the day. I have always been moved by music just that slight bit more than average, I'd say. My spending started with a roughly 200€ Bose bluetooth speaker back in my first grade of highschool. What an extraterrestrial thing that was in early 2010s. And it keeps on playing to this day – a true testament of quality. Also sounded fantastic back then, nowadays … yeah, not so much. Lots of BT speakers, TWS, car audio speakers, IEMs, etc., later bring me to this day when I truly consider myself an audiophile. What brings me the most joy beside listening to music is singing, so I am currently participating in a choir and challenging myself with solo vocal covers (check the links in my signature to hear my projects). Unsure where all this leads, but the journey itself is marvelous and life is nothing but a journey.


How The Review is Structured
I will start off by mentioning the packaging and accessories, then place the showcased IEM in my special trademarked graph accompanied with other similarly priced IEMs I own and know well. Then I continue by giving it a score on certain qualities to help reach the final star score. Those that are seriously considering a beautiful looking and driver-packed set, please read the song examples below too to get as much of a feel on what one could expect. I really try my best to cover a wide variety to paint the sonic picture of the set for as many of you as possible. For this one, I will go ahead and take the liberty of comparing it directly to two other slightly lower-priced but well received single-dynamic-driver sets, so to get an idea of what this multitude of drivers of varied technologies does differently.

20240512_104442.jpg


I will mention some songs of varied genres and try to convey what one can expect from the Kinera Celest Phoenixcall. As sources I have been using my FiiO BTR7 on high gain and Venture Electronics RA2B-FE + Prime DAC. Certainly no lack of power and quite a different taste on both. Listening was done at a volume ranging between 80-90dB. I am using the stock cable to keep it original in that regard and Divinus Velvet small-sized eartips (had to size down due to a lengthier and thicker nozzle than usual. I always review with fresh ears – no other IEM gets any ear-time while I am desperately collecting my thoughts regarding the reviewed item.

20240512_104228.jpg


Disclaimer: I have received this unit free of charge via Kinera in exchange for a review. I am in no way incentivized to speak highly of this set. Should this review tip you over the edge and you decide on this IEM as your next purchase, I welcome you to check it out here: AliExpress Kinera official site product link


Packaging & Accessories
20240425_154449.jpg


20240425_154525.jpg


20240425_154555.jpg


20240425_155212.jpg


20240425_155028.jpg


With stock cable and Divinus Velvet Small eartips:
20240511_174755.jpg


Unboxing experience is pretty nice, however it is ultimately let down by rather poor eartips which means looking for an aftermarket replacement is almost a must. The stock 4.4mm cable feels good and does the job well enough. I experienced no discomfort fit-wise, but these do have a rather long and stubby nozzle, so buyer beware.

20240430_165622~2.jpg


Let's Get Going!

Graph & Scores

This trademarked graph I came up with does not come with a thick user manual. All you need to know is that sets further left are warmer than sets further right, and sets higher up are better technically than sets lower down. Those little yellow lines on both axis represent where sets with average technicalities and neutral overall balance lay. I have also added two other single DD representatives to better place the perceived tuning balance of the Phoenixcall – the Simgot EA500 LM and Kiwi Ears Singolo.
BackgroundEraser_20240512_110212791.png


Here are my scores on the Phoenixcall in individual categories. All three subcategories of each of the frequency spectrums can be rated 1-5. Keep in mind that I am scoring regardless of the price, so cheaper sets getting a 3 in any given subcategory is already good going. I had to approach this in a simplistic manner so to keep it easy to understand and compare sets. Since this is my first more complex driver setup IEM and I had nothing to really directly compare it to this was not an easy task.

BackgroundEraser_20240512_105630001.png



3 Song Examples With Comparisons to Two Single DDs


Instead of flowing through the songs and putting down my thoughts like I did in my reviews up until now, I will try to spice it up by offering a view of how the Phoenixcall compares against three very different single DDs. This helps those of you that might own or have at least heard any of the other sets to get a better idea of the Phoenixcall. Since this is a direct A/B comparison, expect some differences to be expressed in an overemphasized fashion just to clearly depict which is better – TO MY EARS AND MY LIKING.


Song #1:
First minute of this song offers a quick sample to test piano, bass, trombone, and sax timbre as well as female vocals and the perception of stage.

Screenshot_20240309_140927_TIDAL(1).jpg

Creep by Scott Bradlee's Postmodern Jukebox feat. Haley Reinhart

Just the beginning of this song shows so many differences among these three sets already that this will be an interesting challenge to attempt. I am not here to moan, though, so let's go!

This song allows me to understand lots of things about sets. First moments allow me to get to grips with set's bass balance, piano&vocal timbre, vocal placement, sibilance, spaciousness, 3D-ness, … So if I try to put some of these into context, it would read something like this. Bass on the Phoenixcall is not of basshead quantities. It prioritizes midbass over subbass and it paints a decently clean overall sonic picture. No issues of bass overflowing into low mids and messing with the piano in this instance. Bass stays in this smaller bubble which is either a good or a bad thing, depending on application. Here I am not bothered by that, since it allows for the rest of performers to take charge. Piano lacks that delicious note weight I myself am very sensitive to, but remains a piano throughout, so to say timbre is not an issue. Haley sounds very convincing and wonderful as she should, I would like to see her sonic image just a tad bit taller and further forward. Sibilance is handled very aptly and there is just the right amount of bite to instrumentation and vocals that float in that risky frequency range. Always a serious challenge not to overdampen the 6-8kHz range and end up with a thick sounding vocal and various strings. All performers have sufficient space between them to really be able to focus on either one should you wish to do so – then there is the everlasting debate about what do we listen to, a single performer or the song as a whole and in my mind a good set should be able to do both. Keep the cohesiveness and flow of the song untouched while really delivering the absolute detail of whichever single part of the arrangement. Here I feel the Phoenixcall does very well actually, but do not come in expecting endgame detail retrieval nor resolution. And about 3D-ness, I would prefer a bit more depth capabilities to really round of the images since they do sit a bit flat in a 2D scene. Talking about the whole package I would happily judge this performance as an 8/10.

In a quick A/B comparison the Singolo feels a lot more bassy which in turn means the perceived mids and highs are much calmer vs Phoenixcall. It also feels much more rounded around its edges, which manifests in lesser detail retrieval and technical prowess throughout. I do not really feel it has any serious advantage in regards to cohesiveness either, despite being a single DD. Treble is worse in just about every metric, but it luckily does not come off as sibilant either. There is still no 3D-ness so it remains a flat sounding stage. Piano has a bit better note weight, so it is a bit more pleasing to my ears on the Singolo. Stage is wider on the Singolo.

And as for the EA500 LM, the first thing I notice is the vocal placement being more to my taste in a taller and more forward manner. Piano sounds clearer and just a bit more convincing here overall. The forwardness of vocals is slightly ruined by the fact the sibilance region is not as well executed as on the Phoenixcall which means every now and then the sibilant sounds come out a bit too prominently, at least for my younger ears. I would have to say it sounds a bit better connected or flowing overall too as the Phoenixcall which might be down to the reduced mids on Phoenixcall just before the pinna gain. Treble is good on both, but I'd give it to the Phoenixcall by a hair.


Song #2:
Progressive rock in all its glory. A very good indication of detail retrieval, male vocal, guitars, drums.

Screenshot_20240512_155019_TIDAL~2.jpg

Depth of Self-Delusion by Riverside

What first comes to my attention is the good placement of these little sound ornaments at the start. I do get a sense of lighter note weight immediately too, and when drums join I am lacking their elasticity and heft. Hihats though, are delicately done and very pleasing. His vocal is slightly too lightly coloured overall which is down to the midrange tuning which is bound to work with some vocals while not so much with others. Guitars are done tastefully and free of veil. This tune sounds just a bit rough around the edges on the Phoenixcall with certain qualities done tremendously well while other aspects do not work well here. It becomes a bit of a messy listen and therefore a 5/10.

Singolo immediately thereafter is an interesting change of pace. Overall balance sounds much more appropriate for this sort of genre. It adds additional warmth while carefully dealing with potentially problematic areas. It is definitely not as revealing a listen as the Phoenixcall, however. His vocal is much more singular unlike on the Phoenixcall where it feels torn to different particles. I would have to give the advantage for this sort of genre to the Singolo.

EA500 LM is the most revealing of the three which is quite a feat considering it is a single driver. Tonality-wise it is a welcome awakening of the Singolo while not being as bright as the Phoenixcall which is solely down to how well the low bass balances the otherwise very prominent treble of the LM which is not the case on the Phoenixcall. Phoenixcall does a better job of calming down the risky areas than the LM, which is a messy listen when drums and guitars get going. Not as smooth as the Singolo, so for such genres it would be quite tiring to listen to the whole album.


Song #3:
Oh, welcome crazy bass lines, please make yourselves comfortable along with tasteful drops and story-telling male vocals about an ill-intentioned lady.

Screenshot_20240414_162732_TIDAL~2.jpg

Love is a Bitch by Two Feet

This song has a tendency to make the listener turn up the volume to feel those low notes. Since the subbass is greatly reduced on the Phoenixcall this will be a tough task to accomplish. Nonetheless, I am listening to the other aspects as well and lack of subbass is not necessarily the final nail in the coffin. Right from the beginning the low notes are well handled and there is no sense of distortion. They feel athletic and readily available. His voice is not too bothered by the unorthodox midrange tuning and compliments the low end very wonderfully with ample naturalness to the sound and an overall enjoyable manner. The beginning rainstorm floats around the head freely while acompanied with a sweet guitar. The circumference of the raining sounds is very healthily above average and decently detailed. With other elements joining the mix the low bass becomes insufficient to really power this song home. Still, it is a very well executed and joyous listen which earns it a score of 7/10.

Soon after switching to Singolo, I can sense the rainstorm circling in a completely different elyptical shape with ample width but less forwards and backwards sense of separation. Guitar is also not as delicate and soothing on the Singolo. Oh, but then the low rumble comes and the tube of the Singolo and its large DD are in another league in that regard. His vocals are better placed here, but a bit more dim or smoky. The hihats are just a bit too pronounced here and due to the fact I feel the Singolo's worst part is the treble they become very annoying in that main part. Bass is a totally different beast, but overall I prefer how the Phoenixcall renders this tune.

EA500 LM's rain sounds the most true to life. Guitar is very detailed too, but just a bit more digitalised than on the Phoenixcall. LM is not shy in low bass, but it does not stand out as much because of the treble being even more prominent and aggressive. I would have to EQ certain areas of the LM for this song to really gel with my ears. It comes off just a bit too sharp. Perfect combination for this tune would be the LM's bass with Singolo's vocal placement and Phoenixcall's treble.


To keep it a bit more brief and readable, this concludes my song examples and hopefully you found some information that proves useful to your decision-making in the everlasting dilemma of To Buy or Not To Buy. Should you be interested in any other songs in particular, please do not hesitate to ask!


To Sum Up The Kinera Celest Phoenixcall


Phoenixcall is a gorgeous set that packs various driver technologies in an attractive shell. It boasts a nicely balanced frequency range where in particular I would say the treble is nicely done, while mids and bass are an acquired taste and need some more understanding of your own preferences before committing to purchasing. In regards to bass, one needs to prefer a lean towards midbass over subbass while the mids are a special sort and do better with certain vocals. Do keep in mind this set fits rather deep too.

Thanks for reading and stay wonderful.

MetehanMinatozaki

New Head-Fier
Midrange?
Pros: -Good bass texture for price
-Good bass amount
-Airy treble
-Good treble amount
-Really good detail production for the price
-Good resolution
Cons: -Awful, thin sounding midrange
-Bad note weight
-Really bad lower mids
Disclaimers

I bought this iem with my own money. This review is completely subjective.

v3HJbULxohn4-DKr6UeFshhFm8v6SyzL_q6MMTWLwW_Yq780OatqdKIDP5cnjaMxUdY9xk4-CJaBu4dDZlAyqU6sRKLFlxKsiRTcj09JdgzV7dTfhFp4JYLcwL3W6sVut2fk7smf1DXWj8HnomAJYw


Accessories

Phoenixcall comes with carrying case, eartips, cable and iem itself. Pretty standard box content.

v6wTcaiSm1UQ0kPrqcbP-zCXgxoQT22yHtWXUHJqeqhmr7Nh5td6UlyyV9G9dz1LTAlVOveFSqdzhHJvoLeVwkAMeh27sVCK75umv9idaLEj1WrmjhFUT7FsyDgGaX32yRuP2fNAQKRCcLsL8WgOnQ


Build

Phoenixcall fully made out of average quality plastic. Cable quality is decent.

Qfhh9NHH7HnoAuict5ukji4zXusb1fBvisZisqoWedXa5eBcB1VESg2-9wtjjWE_AiDQGK-1Xky6p87hehly33NkE4qH-kqKx8Rk05uGhx81qXRBfqaDYSWRIttt5B4GoA_11nEUwCIPiwaY2fDT2Q


Sound-Tonality and Technicalities

Phoenixcall is a very thin sounding iem. Midrange sounds awful, instrument separation is really bad and note weight is non-existent but, I have some good news too (if you care :D) This is iem have a really good detail production for 130 dollars. Treble range feels airy and understated. And bass range have good depth with enough mid-bass, sub-bass amount.

uPArXX8pAj0VZ3TgT8knQXPCEmkACMwr6tYcokek4gIRdUaWslFoe7lLaWbXqnR_iN8Xk0J40JTWa5HfzbAsMzeFDlpEHKnVy8YcBydyiq5SrFuu3zSuxT0oEBBmQ8gLizelXJ83VIShBLjyXl4Djw


Conclusion

If you don’t care about midrange, phoenixcall is a pretty good sounding pair of iem’s But subjectively i hate phoenixcall and i don’t want to suggest anyone to buy this IEM.
Colin5619
Colin5619
I own the Pheonixcall as well and bought it with my hard earned cash. When I first listened to it, the bass and Highs sounded great. The highs are very airy, sparking and detailed, the bass tight, but the mids? Too recessed for my liking, and a tad thin. Still a good buy for those who aren’t into vocals, my son, loves the highs and claims the best he has ever heard. But he doesn’t like the rest.

Nice review, enjoying you reviews, not every IEM earns a 4 to 5 star review, exactly like it should be. Keep your honestly going in them.
MetehanMinatozaki
MetehanMinatozaki
Thank you for support!

Comments

There are no comments to display.
Back
Top